Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 18:24:44 +0000 From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@execmail.ca> To: Robert Watson <robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org> Cc: Chad David <davidc@lodge.guild.ab.ca>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: nos-tun using IP protocol 94 (was: coda and tunX) Message-ID: <EXECMAIL.990221182444.A@ht46l.execmail.ca> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990221121807.6354B-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990221121807.6354B-100000@fledge.watson.org> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902181939160.55088-100000@lodge.guild.ab.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Part9902211824.B Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="ipm.txt" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="ipm.txt" > I did this also at one point, but switched to looking at nos-tun now in > 3.0 and 4.0. It has the advantage of not being home-rolled I was looking at this the other week, and noticed it uses the old protocol 94 encapsulation, instead of protocol 4. We dropped the "94" tunnels on ampr-net years ago. nos-tun should probably be changed to use the standard encapsulation protocol number. --lyndon --Part9902211824.B Content-Type: Application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.5.2 (C) 1997-1998 Network Associates, Inc. and its affiliated companies. iQA/AwUBNtBPbxvgRSChfsw2EQLFjQCg9WM9D4h2YWd8C9Scw8mCcbTq2icAoOx+ L6MsS1meITNimjI/wse4gj/0 =m3R1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Part9902211824.B-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EXECMAIL.990221182444.A>