Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Nov 1999 11:41:32 -0500 (EST)
From:      Niels Provos <provos@monkey.org>
To:        Robert Watson <robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org>
Cc:        Dug Song <dugsong@monkey.org>, Tomaz Borstnar <tomaz.borstnar@over.net>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OpenSSH &  AllowHosts
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSO.4.10.9911221138380.22842-100000@funky.monkey.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.991122005937.27394A-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Robert Watson wrote:
> regularly connect to.  I found that the new OpenSSH ignores the
> hostname-based entries and adds new IP-based entries automatically, with
> minimal warning.  Is it doing all lookups based on IP and adding the key
It does not ignore them.  It does additional checking with the IP address.
You can disable this behaviour by setting CheckHostIP = no in your config
file.

> asking for confirmation, even though host keys are already present with a
> by-name lookup, I'm not sure I like the behavior--names are more likely to
> remain consistent in the world of NATs, dynamic IPs with DNS update, etc.
IP address are only added if the host key associated with the domain name
matches.  Did you actually encounter any problems with this?  Yes, there
are many NATed networks and dynamic IPs out there, but most of them are
not used for remote login.

As I said set CheckHostIP = no solves this, if it is a problem for you.

Niels.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSO.4.10.9911221138380.22842-100000>