Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 18:56:38 -0500 From: Nathan Dorfman <nathan@rtfm.net> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@hotjobs.com>, "David E. Cross" <crossd@phoenix.cs.rpi.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: O_SYNC Message-ID: <19981109185638.B8871@rtfm.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811081043010.19817-100000@porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net>; from Alfred Perlstein on Sun, Nov 08, 1998 at 10:44:24AM -0500 References: <199811072154.QAA00324@phoenix.cs.rpi.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811081043010.19817-100000@porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 08, 1998 at 10:44:24AM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > Yes, however every other OS defines it at "O_SYNC" why are we different? > or, if there is a reason, why isn't there a compatibility #define? > > can someone check this on netbsd/open bsd/os ? is it bsd or us? NetBSD 1.3.2: fcntl.h:92:#define O_SYNC 0x0080 /* synchronous writes */ fcntl.h:127:#define FFSYNC O_SYNC /* kernel */ fcntl.h:129:#define O_FSYNC O_SYNC /* compat */ > Alfred Perlstein - Programmer, HotJobs Inc. - www.hotjobs.com > -- There are operating systems, and then there's FreeBSD. > -- http://www.freebsd.org/ 3.0-current > > On Sat, 7 Nov 1998, David E. Cross wrote: > > > Is 'O_FSYNC" what you are looking for? > > > > #define O_FSYNC 0x0080 /* synchronous writes */ > > > > > > -- > > David Cross > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981109185638.B8871>