Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:07:04 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> To: Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com> Cc: Chris Stenton <jacs@gnome.co.uk>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: old version of PAM in 3.0-stable stopping Samba working? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901261258110.6851-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901261205570.15983-100000@megaweapon.zigg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Matt Behrens wrote: > It looks to me that PAM isn't quite "Linux-compatible", and Samba > was definitely written for Linux PAM. How so? It looked to me like the original poster was just trying to use pam modules for a services they don't implement: > : samba account requisite pam_cleartext_pass_ok.so > : samba account required pam_unix.so try_first_pass That doesn't mean the library is broken or incompatible, just that our modules are different. (And as I said, somewhat minimalist at this point in time.) -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9901261258110.6851-100000>