Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 05:32:28 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa <y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp>, Nick Hibma <n_hibma@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c Message-ID: <19990511213230.A9D7A1F72@spinner.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 May 1999 08:21:37 %2B0100." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905110820500.447-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Rabson wrote: > On Tue, 11 May 1999, NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa wrote: > > > > I was thinking of doing this, the same as alpm and intpm: > > > > > > case 0x<devid>: > > > #if NUHCI > 0 > > > return NULL; > > > #else > > > return "VIA blah USB controller"; > > > #endif > > > > It depends on old-config, so poor mechanism. newconfig already > > implimented best match probe/attach. > > And a very useful mechanism it is. Which is why I implemented priority > ordered probes in -current. For the sake of the thread, this got committed a day or two ago, and these hacks have been replaced with a low priority match. Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990511213230.A9D7A1F72>