Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:31:20 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@caspian.plutotech.com> To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, tech-kern@NetBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftclock() Message-ID: <199906251731.LAA01902@caspian.plutotech.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:15:55 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906251015090.38018-100000@semuta.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ I've dropped tech@openbsd.org based on a request from Theo since he cannot post back to some of these lists. ] >Why have splr semantics? That is, it raises to splsoftclock if current >priority is lower, else doesn't fiddle with it. This is what I meant to suggest, but if this is not doable, create a new spl. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906251731.LAA01902>