Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:38:52 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca> To: Doug <Doug@gorean.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk Subject: Re: ports/12463: Update: Fvwm2 to 2.2.2 Message-ID: <19990701233852.A56449@mad> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907011527170.15370-100000@dt054n86.san.rr.com>; from Doug on Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 03:32:45PM -0700 References: <19990701182508.A31961@mad> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907011527170.15370-100000@dt054n86.san.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 03:32:45PM -0700, Doug wrote: > > they are all the same," which I disagree with (in this instance) purely on > spec. If I have missed some other part of your argument, my apologies. I haven't really made any argument. I'm just fishing for opinions at the moment, and trying to make sure that your stated opinion is really the one you want. :) -- This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990701233852.A56449>