Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 19:36:30 -0500 (EST) From: Modred <modred@ns1.antisocial.net> To: Vincent Poy <vince@venus.GAIANET.NET> Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@internetcds.com>, sthaug@nethelp.no, leifn@neland.dk, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: poor ethernet performance? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907211906180.15958-100000@ns1.antisocial.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907211013530.331-100000@venus.GAIANET.NET>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Vincent Poy wrote: > Speaking about Layer 2 and layer 3. Does the Cisco Catalyst > 2924XL and the HP ProCurve 2424M and 4000M switches fall under Layer 3 or > just layer 2? Cisco, yes... HP, no clue (perhaps you could check their website). 2900XL Architecture Notes: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/cisco/mkt/switch/cat/2900xl \ /tech/malbu_wp.htmhttp://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/cisco/mkt/ \ switch/cat/2900xl/tech/malbu_wp.htm 2900XL Management Guide: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c2900xl/ \ 29_35sa6/index.htm IOW, RTFM. Later, --mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9907211906180.15958-100000>