Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:32:13 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Zepeda <garbanzo@hooked.net> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ElectricFence Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903270931120.252-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9903271120070.25868-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Chuck Robey wrote: > Anyone out there who uses ElectricFence to catch malloc problems, and > knows the correct compile options to make certain that ElectricFence's > malloc, and not the libc malloc, gets called? I'm afraid just linking > with -lefence won't be enough to make the libefence malloc override the > libc malloc. I tend to assume if the EF startup screen is used (and you notice the massive slowdown) it's using the EF malloc. If you're still not convinced stick some debuggin printfs in there (or run it under gdb and set a breakpoint). - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9903270931120.252-100000>