Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 7 Nov 1999 22:41:45 -0500 (EST)
From:      matt <matt@BabCom.ORG>
To:        Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: file name with questions - rm on it seg faults!!!
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.20.9911072229050.41009-100000@s01.arpa-canada.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911072152350.46866-100000@green.myip.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Sun, 7 Nov 1999, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
[.snip.]
: That's correct, since they both use fts(3).  I recall that it's still
: not fixed; even in OpenBSD's source, it's better than ours getting
: crashed, but it's still not fixed properly.

By 'not fixed' do you mean that the problem is not "properly" fixed, or
that the vulnerabilty is still there? 

[.snip.] 
: -- 
:  Brian Fundakowski Feldman           \  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!  /
:  green@FreeBSD.org                    `------------------------------'
 

--
"If the primates that we came from had known that someday politicians
 would come out of the...the gene pool, they'd a stayed up in the trees
 and written evolution off as a bad idea. Hell, I always thought the
 opposable thumb was overrated."
        -Sheridan, "A Distant Star"



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.20.9911072229050.41009-100000>