Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:52:37 -0800 (PST) From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org> To: abial@webgiro.com (Andrzej Bialecki) Cc: rizzo@aciri.org, small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sash as a shell replacement ? Message-ID: <200101102352.f0ANqbI56681@iguana.aciri.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0101110011360.61221-100000@mx.webgiro.com> from Andrzej Bialecki at "Jan 11, 2001 0:15: 9 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> sash has very poor shell functionality. I would suggest using Minix sh > which is very Bourne-like, and is also very small. what kind of licensing does it have ? I was about to go for a different approach, namely use the standard sh as a shell, and a slightly modified 'sash' for a bunch of commands such as more, grep etc. cheers luigi > BTW. if someone has the time and inclination to make a couple of ports for > useful small Minix programs, I can provide the patches to make them run > under FreeBSD. > > Andrzej Bialecki > > // <abial@webgiro.com> WebGiro AB, Sweden (http://www.webgiro.com) > // ------------------------------------------------------------------- > // ------ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve. http://www.freebsd.org -------- > // --- Small & Embedded FreeBSD: http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ ---- > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101102352.f0ANqbI56681>