Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 07:36:23 +0100 (CET) From: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> To: gabriel@maquina.com (Jose Gabriel Marcelino) Cc: sos@FreeBSD.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt), cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata ata-all.c ata-disk.c ata-dma.c Message-ID: <199912080636.HAA19896@freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.20.9912080335500.1515-100000@devils.maquina.com> from Jose Gabriel Marcelino at "Dec 8, 1999 03:41:45 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems Jose Gabriel Marcelino wrote: > On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Søren Schmidt wrote: > > > sos 1999/12/07 14:07:19 PST > > > > Modified files: > > sys/dev/ata ata-all.c ata-disk.c ata-dma.c > > Log: > > Try a little harder at the VIA DMA support. > > Only use UDMA66 on 82C686 and with prober cable. > > Hi again, > > Thanks for looking into this however this recent patch still doesn't work > as it recognizes my 82C586 as a 82C686 and tries UDMA66 (failing to mount > root again): > > ata-pci0: <VIA 82C686 ATA controller> at device 7.1 on pci0 > ata-pci0: Busmastering DMA supported Hmm, I need a complete dmesg from a verbose boot to see whats going on, I dont understand how it can try UDMA66 unless you have a UDMA66 drive with an UDMA66 cable on it... > > This is the relevant output of pciconf -l > > ata-pci0@pci0:7:1: class=0x01018a card=0x00000000 chip=0x05711106 > rev=0x06 hdr=0x00 Hmm, come to think of it VIA's versioning of chips sucks :) -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912080636.HAA19896>