Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 13:04:21 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net> Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, Dan Langille <dan@freebsddiary.org>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: skip requires X? Message-ID: <20000202130421.C42626@mithrandr.moria.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002012129140.305-100000@picnic.mat.net> References: <20000201212336.F79328@jade.chc-chimes.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002012129140.305-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue 2000-02-01 (21:32), Chuck Robey wrote: > What about taking the X dependency out of emacs, Bill. It can build > without it, you know. If you try it, better get your flack jacket > out. It will be wildly unpopular, but the argument is just like gd. This doesn't have to be a "in" vs. "out" argument. Have an emacs-with-X port, and a emacs-without-X port, much like vim-lite and vim5. That's if you want separate packages - otherwise just have a make variable to determine what you want, and only generate the emacs-with-X package. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@rucus.ru.ac.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000202130421.C42626>