Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 17:03:01 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Optimisation patch Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003231701500.48015-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003231837170.47847-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > Any objections to the following?
>
> I don't mind at all ... I was wondering about just taking out the ability
> to even USE -O2 in the compiler, but there're probably *some* non-kernel
> related reasons for using it, and we shouldn't block it at that
> point. Not for FreeBSD, but for some users doing their own code on
> FreeBSD.
Right..I saw the discussion on -stable, and I think it would be a bad idea
as well. gcc -O2 is a tool which isn't always broken (excepting alpha
breakage), so we shouldn't limit its use in the general case.
Kris
----
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0003231701500.48015-100000>