Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 17:26:26 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai@bart.nl> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 Message-ID: <20000323172625.C40360@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003240244520.2625-100000@alphplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 02:46:50AM %2B1100 References: <20000323162204.H39576@lucifer.bart.nl> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003240244520.2625-100000@alphplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20000323 16:50], Bruce Evans (bde@zeta.org.au) wrote: >On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > >> -On [20000323 16:05], Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven (asmodai@FreeBSD.org) wrote: >> > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_3) >> > . Makefile.inc1 >> > Log: >> > Fix groff breakage with regard to the safer macros. >> >> My question, shall I apply this fix to 4 and 5 as well, since it makes >> sense to use the newer macro's in the $WORLDTMP environment over the >> currently present ones. > >Of course (after testing). I tested this extensively under 3.x since that is where I got the reports from. I hope to do some testing this weekend, need my new ATX PSU first. >It is not just a fix for the safer macros. I think it fixes complete >brokenness of the bootstrap of groff when groff is not already >installed. Aye. Agreed. Another necessary dependency in the Makefile ouvre which we solve by this. It makes perfect sense to me in every way. Thanks for steering me onto this solution. =) -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator <asmodai@bart.nl> VIA NET.WORKS The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.bart.nl A rose is a rose is a rose is a rose... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000323172625.C40360>