Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:20:54 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/crypto/openssh canohost.c ssh.h sshd.c Message-ID: <20000626142054.A2392@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006261701000.78867-100000@green.dyndns.org>; from green@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 05:02:39PM -0400 References: <20000626005246.A11096@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006261701000.78867-100000@green.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 05:02:39PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > You're most likely right about that. Pardon my ignorance, but what is the > actual harm done by taking another file off the vendor branch, this one > being only a couple hundred lines? I thought that it was only because the > file would be duplicated in the repository. Grrrr. Do you not read your committers mail?? Have you missed all the many treaties on this in the past 3 months? It has been explained *MANY* times in 2000 alone. Please go see the archives search for "vendor branch". The fact you don't understand also tells me you are not ready to commit to src/contrib (aka src/crypto/ in this case) w/o a review. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000626142054.A2392>