Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 15:15:21 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: "Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net> Cc: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@dsuper.net>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: stuck in LAST_ACK Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007071510310.77395-100000@achilles.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007071420300.21550-100000@overlord.e-gerbil.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote: > The full LAST_ACK list was in a previous email, 4.0-STABLE, didn't think > the newreno stuff was an issue there. It's not newreno related, it's a fix that is related to sockets getting stuck in LAST_ACK when the system is low/out of mbufs. (And the patch has been mfc'd to 3 and 4.) How old is your -STABLE? The patch was added on June 8th or so. Although with your huge number of mbufs, I doubt you ran out an caused the situation. OTOH, the high number of mbufs/mbuf clusters you have is almost worrysome; a netkill on that box could eat up a LOT of memory, which won't get freed. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007071510310.77395-100000>