Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 16:30:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: making the snoop device loadable. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007091629350.407-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007091624380.407-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>> Ok, I give in to the argument. I would just like to make a wish. On Jan >>> 24 1999 peter took the NO_LKM option out of LINT. I assume the support >>> for it in other files was removed around that time also. Could someone >>> implement a NO_KLD option so you dont need to use securelevel > 0 so >>> people have an obvious option and dont have to know the kernel well enough >>> to hack syscalls.master? >> >>Patches accepted. :) Seriously, if you come up with a patchset >>I'll look at it and see about getting it in the tree. >> >>John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > >Thanks for the offer, but I've already mentioned in an earlier email I >couldnt code hello world without documentation if my life depended on >it. If it helps, I think you can use X in netbsd in higher securelevels. Oops, duh, replied to the wrong subject. I'll try to find the commits removing NO_LKM support and see what I can do, it might be similar. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007091629350.407-100000>