Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 19:20:12 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Justin Wolf <jjwolf@bleeding.com> Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Displacement of Blame[tm] Message-ID: <v04210106b593fd42032f@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007131456580.38552-100000@neo.bleeding.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007131456580.38552-100000@neo.bleeding.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 2:59 PM -0700 7/13/00, Justin Wolf wrote: > > Because we are trying to provide a service to FreeBSD users. > >Then send it to freebsd-security. Any emails sent to non-FreeBSD >lists could still omit the FreeBSD bit from the header. That was the earlier debate. That debate had been settled, and we do want to provide this service, and the bugtraq list is a reasonable place to do it, and the subject should say something about freebsd in it if it has to do with anything installed via the freebsd ports collection. I really don't want to rehash THAT debate. I wouldn't mind a little brain-storming to see if we can come up with a better format for the subjects, but I don't want to start back at square one and debate every aspect of this all over again. In fact, the main reason I haven't wanted to ask about the format of subjects was because I was afraid we WOULD end up debating the entire topic all over again. That's just my opinion, of course. --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v04210106b593fd42032f>