Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Jul 2000 17:43:55 -0700
From:      Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com>
To:        David Nugent <davidn@blaze.net.au>
Cc:        freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Linux pread() / pwrite()
Message-ID:  <39764B4B.926334A9@cup.hp.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007201019420.20549-100000@biscuit.mel.ausisp.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Nugent wrote:
> 
> Is there any particular reason why we do not gate Linux pread()/pwrite()
> syscalls into our kernel's version of the same functions? Linux and BSD
> manpages don't seem to indicate that there's some difference, but I note
> that Linux emulation currently defines them as stubs only.

They are implemented and MFC'd just this week.

The difference is on the syscall level, BTW.

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar
  mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org
  tel:  (408) 447-4222


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39764B4B.926334A9>