Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 13:09:12 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: David Kirchner <dpk@parodius.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Strange procfs bug(?) 3.2-RELEASE Message-ID: <20000911130912.N12231@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009111218440.80992-100000@pentarou.parodius.com>; from dpk@parodius.com on Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 12:19:25PM -0700 References: <20000911120640.J12231@fw.wintelcom.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009111218440.80992-100000@pentarou.parodius.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* David Kirchner <dpk@parodius.com> [000911 12:19] wrote: > > > Yes, there's a problem with procfs in 3.2 when you stress it heavily > > like that, my suggestion is to get 4-stable running, or at least try > > to get 3.5.1 up and running, but I'm unsure if it's fixed in 3.5.1. > > > > -Alfred > > Is this related? : > > "Don't call calcru() on a swapped-out process. calcru() access p_stats, > which is in U-area." > > That's from CVSweb at file procfs_status.c, revision 1.14 I'm not really a procfs guru, I only know about your reported problem, I've never heard of that message though. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000911130912.N12231>