Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 13:18:07 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>, Bill Paul <wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vx driver patch Message-ID: <200011082018.NAA32387@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 08 Nov 2000 15:08:27 EST." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011081507310.32919-100000@sasami.jurai.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011081507310.32919-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011081507310.32919-100000@sasami.jurai.net> "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: : On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Warner Losh wrote: : > The cardbus code, for example, will or in the RF_SHAREABLE bit when : > appropriate. : : Right, but the drivers that are consumers of the PCI or CARDBUS bus : interface shouldn't have to deal with RF_SHAREABLE; the bus driver should : do that. I grant you that this isn't the case at the moment but it should : be. We are in violent agreement. The cardbus bridge code is the one that adds RF_SHAREABLE in the right places. This should allow us, in the fullness of time, to share interrupts for the 16-bit cards in cardbus sockets, for example, w/o sharing them for those cards in a i82365SL socket. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011082018.NAA32387>