Date: 10 May 2001 18:35:49 +0100 From: Wayne Pascoe <wayne.pascoe@realtime.co.uk> To: Dru <genisis@istar.ca> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: TCP/IP Subnetting Message-ID: <86bsp185u2.fsf@pan.penguinpowered.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105101324440.33793-100000@istar.ca> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105101324440.33793-100000@istar.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dru <genisis@istar.ca> writes: > Hi Wayne, > > What's your ultimate goal here? I see that you want to have 4 addresses on > one subnet, how many do you need on your other subnet and do they have to > all be on the same subnet? i.e. do you absolutely need 120 addresses on > one segment? My ideal solution would be 4 addresses on one segment, and 120 on the other. I could live with less on the second segment, but the more the better. If I have to put more addresses on the first segment to achieve this, so be it :) Oh, and before anyone says anything about using a different range, I am only using 192.168.1 in this as an example. I've actually been allocated a range that I have to use :) Thanks in advance :) -- - Wayne Pascoe E-mail: wayne.pascoe@realtime.co.uk Phone : +44 (0) 20 7544 4668 Mobile: +44 (0) 788 431 1675 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86bsp185u2.fsf>