Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:45:00 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.org>, Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>, Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@unixdaemons.com>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org>, Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Subject:   Re: Patch for critical_enter()/critical_exit() & interrupt assem
Message-ID:  <200202281845.g1SIj0U37687@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202281002200.6492-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
    Not to put too fine a point on it, but, I don't see how this can
    possibly justify preventing me from committing my critical_*() stuff.
    You've just stated publically that your preemption stuff is unusable
    as it currently stands.  Why am I supposed to wait an arbitrary period
    of time for you to fix, test, and commit it?

    I would REALLY like to commit my critical_*() stuff, and for the record
    this will also include the stage-2 stuff described in the original commit
    comments that will be made a few days after the current commit.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>

:> 
:> Preemptive kernels don't even make it out of single user mode for SMP machines,
:> ok?  We aren't talking minor breakage here, we are talking _extreme_ breakage. 
:> If people want to play with it, preempt.patch on freefall is updated via a cron
:> job every half hour or so.  Unfortunately, however, it's in a limbo atm due to
:> KSE and needing to sort out how the priorities are going to work.  It will
:> really be better to let KSE settle into the scheduler first adn then add
:> preemption to the scheduler itself afterwards.
:> 
:> The reason I'm not pushing preemption into the tree fully (I've already
:> committed half of the original patch) is that there is other work (proc locking
:> for example) that gets us more bang for the buck.
:> 
:> -- 
:> 
:> John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
:> "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/
:> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200202281845.g1SIj0U37687>