Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 18:10:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, NAKAJI Hiroyuki <nakaji@boggy.acest.tutrp.tut.ac.jp>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Post-KSE disaster with libc_r Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207011810450.91887-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207011751230.91887-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
turned out to be minor.. see other mail On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > I'm not sure. I would be interested in seeing any warnings from building > > new libc_r. The only places I can think of are the queues (with the > > QMD debug defined, that would definitely cause problems), but that > > seems to have been ruled out also when queue.h was reverted. Did > > USRSTACK or SIGSTKSZ get changed somehow? > > > > Someone can also try going into lib/libc_r/test and running the > > tests in there, to see if even simple threaded programs are borken > > or not. > > I'd try but... > cc -Wall -pipe -g3 -D_LIBC_R_ -D_REENTRANT -c mutex_d.c -o mutex_d_a.o > mutex_d.c:168: initializer element is not constant > mutex_d.c: In function `waiter': > mutex_d.c:358: warning: too few arguments for format > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/lib/libc_r/test. > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0207011810450.91887-100000>