Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:42:46 -0600 From: "Alejandro Ramirez" <ales@megared.net.mx> To: "Jonathon McKitrick" <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Cc: "Stan Brown" <stanb@netcom.com>, "Free BSD Questions list" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: fsck and large filesystems. Message-ID: <02c301bf4d6d$1f6a56e0$d2630a0a@megared.net.mx> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912231725130.21789-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Alejandro Ramirez wrote: > > > It is supposed that if you are using softupdates, you will not have to > >run fsck again, but its still enabled by default, just to make sure that > >everything its ok (by now), this its a quote from a talk with Mr. Kirk > >Mckusick at FreeBSDCon. > > So does this mean softupdates obviates the need to run fsck on an dirty > partition? What about / if it isn't soft-enabled? Then if its not "soft-enabled", you should run fsck in it. Merry Xmas Ales To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?02c301bf4d6d$1f6a56e0$d2630a0a>