Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 01:39:10 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Chris BeHanna <behanna@zbzoom.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Stable <stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: is "stable" "stable"? Message-ID: <200107300739.f6U7dAw34052@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 29 Jul 2001 21:07:55 EDT." <Pine.BSF.4.32.0107292106400.7317-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0107292106400.7317-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.32.0107292106400.7317-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> Chris BeHanna writes: : > Then use a point release with the security patches applied. : : I.e., track RELENG_4_3 instead of RELENG_4. Since 4.3 was released, there have been only 9 commits to the 4.3 branch. That's gotta be insanely stable. :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200107300739.f6U7dAw34052>