Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:17:31 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net>
Cc:        "David O'Brien -Hackers" <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: import NetBSD rc system
Message-ID:  <20010616091731.A81063@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0106160749290.25983-100000@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com>; from gordont@bluemtn.net on Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 07:58:06AM -0700
References:  <20010616011923.A39762@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0106160749290.25983-100000@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 07:58:06AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> I'll submit the patches I have for this that make it work in both FreeBSD
> and NetBSD. BTW, why do we use libutil.h and they use util.h?

Just the way things are.
 
> I like Matt's idea (I think it was Matt) to have a new_rc switch. I'll
> look at adding the code for it and submitting a patch,

You are going off on a tangent.  You are worried about the flag day
before we even have a flag to run up the poll.

> > > /etc/rc.subr ported
> >
> > What changes were needed here?
> 
> I basically added a function called checkwildno() that is similar to
> checkyesno that returns 1 for NO (plus variants) or '' and returns 0 for
> anything else.  This gets rid of alot of case statements in the modules,
> making them simple if's.

Again, why don't we just concentrate on porting the NetBSD scripts and
not the second system enhancements?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010616091731.A81063>