Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:11:58 +0100 From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> To: Linh Pham <lplist@closedsrc.org> Cc: dochawk@psu.edu, FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: which is faster zip drive under FreeBSD: usb or parallel? Message-ID: <20010626181158.E81113@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0106260946580.26804-100000@q.closedsrc.org>; from lplist@closedsrc.org on Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 09:51:47AM -0700 References: <20010626175829.D81113@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0106260946580.26804-100000@q.closedsrc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
| Zip 250 might be the way to go then... If you really need portability, | then the USB Powered Zip 250 model will work (since you won't need to | lug around a wall wart). If you want speed, SCSI is the best model, but | you need adapters for that to work on a laptop. Guess i should stop being greedy, and be happy with my parallel zip 250. :-) I thought about buying the USB 250, but that would only make sense if it were significantly faster. Jonathon -- Microsoft complaining about the source license used by Linux is like the event horizon calling the kettle black. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010626181158.E81113>