Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 05:06:29 +0100 From: Jez Hancock <jez.hancock@munkboxen.mine.nu> To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bandwidth billing and measurement scripts Message-ID: <20020619050629.A7749@munkboxen.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0206190658420.42332-100000@flash.mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua>; from artem@mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua on Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 07:02:09AM %2B0300 References: <20020619000227.A5671@munkboxen.mine.nu> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0206190658420.42332-100000@flash.mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 07:02:09AM +0300, Artyom V. Viklenko wrote: > There is no possibility for ipfw to understood name-based virtual hosting! > It is in a different (application) layer, while ipfw work > solely with ip pakets - network layer. > > To monitor usage of my web servers I use webaliser. Each virtual web > server logs its activity in separate files and then webaliser can > process tem. Cheers Artyom... just curious, had thought that was the case, just after verification. -- Nobody ever got fired for choosing Microsoft, but Nobody ever looked stupid for choosing FreeBSD... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020619050629.A7749>