Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 Oct 2004 10:51:11 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Andrew Ryder <atr@mrcoffee.org>
To:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: Need 'remote power bar' recommendations ...
Message-ID:  <20041004104634.T72397@beans.mrcoffee.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.50L0.0410040729210.94815-100000@fryit.atlasta.net>
References:  <A8535F8D62F3644997E91F4F66E341FC9E33DC@exchange.sandvine.com> <Pine.BSF.4.50L0.0410040729210.94815-100000@fryit.atlasta.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

I own a DS-RPC2 + RPC3. I use both for colocated equipment. I have 
DS71-MD3 for one using a POTS line. On my RPC3, I have the DS72 telnet 
access module. It's hard to find the DS62 with ssh (VPN comes in handy) I 
suggest calling Baytech with the Serial numbers ready from the boards + 
unit. They won't talk to you without these (but I've got both off ebay so 
don't think they won't help you at all)

The baytech adapters are very weird. After blowing 3 modular db9 adapters, 
I gave up and ordered their adapters with my firmware chip upgrades (they 
ship you these for the cost of shipping)

They're a good company to deal with. I've never used WTI/Comtrol products 
for this application but there is a good dealer in California I've ordered 
from a few times on eBay.

-Andrew

On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, David Raistrick wrote:

> On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>>
>> Any particular model, or they are all good?  Found this one, which appears
>> to do what I want ...
>>
>>          http://www.kvms.com/nav/item.asp?item=4228
>
>
> I've got 4 of the Baytech RPC3's (the last part of the number, ie -15NC
> describes the plug style.) and one WTI unit.
>
> I prefer the Baytech's over the WTI, though the WTI has been shelved for
> about a year now.  As someone else mentions, it does have problems if you
> disconnect a telnet session without logging out...you'll have to wait a
> bit.
>
> Oh, and the RPC3's are 1u instead of 2...that helps. :)
>
>
> They both work well, though.  Memory says the Baytechs have a bit more
> per-port power-usage reporting, etc, but I don't really remember now.
>
>
> ...david
>
> ---
> david raistrick        http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> drais@atlasta.net             http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041004104634.T72397>