Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 16:42:57 -0400 From: erob <erob@videotron.ca> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/63427: Disabling the Java frontend at compile time Message-ID: <20040706204257.GA63172@none> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0407061936550.35158@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> References: <200407052102.i65L2ikG066536@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040705223416.GA488@none> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0407061936550.35158@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 07:41:24PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Etienne Robillard wrote: > > You're probably right about the complexity thing. > > However, I doubt that disabling libgcj is sufficient (in my case) > > in areas like saving compilation time and/or space. > > Perhaps you could conduct an experiment and check how much compilation > time and/or space you will save when disabling the Java frontend per se, > and not just libgcj? > > I'd be interested to see the differences between > - full gcc34 port > - gcc34 port without libgcj > - gcc34 port without libgcj and the whole Java frontend > > If the data is convincing, I'm still worried about the complexity thing, > but if there is a worthwhile payoff and one of my fellow ports committers > who has more experience in this area is willing to review the patch, I'll > let this convince myself. :-) Deal? > > Gerald Sure, no problem. I'll set this up and get back to you as soon as I get some results. Regards, Etienne > -- > Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) gerald@pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040706204257.GA63172>