Date: 25 Feb 2001 12:10:41 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> Cc: simond@irrelevant.org, Justin McKnight <jmcknigh@stevens-tech.edu>, FreeBSD-newbies <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Compaq e500, 3com cardbus card help Message-ID: <xzpofvrj9vy.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Kenneth Wayne Culver's message of "Sun, 25 Feb 2001 01:30:45 -0500 (EST)" References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0102250130410.10786-100000@rac3.wam.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> writes: > On 24 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> writes: > > > FreeBSD supports cardbus in -CURRENT, but I wouldn't expect it to ever > > > support cardbus in 4.x. If you are daring you can get -CURRENT, but from > > > what I hear right now, it's not working very well. > > It works just fine, thank you very much, but it takes some > > hand-holding. > Must not be cardbus then. I beg your pardon? Were you trying to say that -CURRENT does not work very well, or that Cardbus does not work very well? I assumed the former, which is partly true (-CURRENT works fine if you keep close enough track of things to know when it's safe to upgrade and how to fix or work around whatever bugs you hit). If you meant the latter, I beg to differ - Cardbus itself works fine and dandy for me. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpofvrj9vy.fsf>