Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 02:08:28 -0400 From: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Performance issue Message-ID: <378E5258-A3FA-4B3E-8F3E-2E330417966C@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0505100117320.1139-100000@sea.ntplx.net> References: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0505100117320.1139-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On May 10, 2005, at 1:24 AM, Daniel Eischen wrote: > No, libc_r wraps execve() and a lot of other syscalls that libpthread > or libthr don't need to. Take a look at libc_r/uthread/ > uthread_execve.c > and you will see it sets the signal mask before exec()ing. Couldn't we do the same thing in libpthread, in the not-threaded case? I apologize if I'm asking stupid questions.. :) -- Suleiman Souhlal | ssouhlal@vt.edu The FreeBSD Project | ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?378E5258-A3FA-4B3E-8F3E-2E330417966C>