Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 17:49:50 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: jason andrade <jason@dstc.edu.au> Cc: hubs@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD/ia64 5.0-RC1 released Message-ID: <20021208014950.GB1987@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0212081050100.6363-100000@sunburn.dstc.edu.au> References: <20021208004834.GB54131@itanium.pn.xcllnt.net> <Pine.GSO.4.44.0212081050100.6363-100000@sunburn.dstc.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:54:20AM +1000, jason andrade wrote: > On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > I just finished copying the FreeBSD/ia64 5.0-RC1 bits. The FTP > > tree and iso images are placed under /pub/FreeBSD/releases/ia64 > > with two new readme files under /pub/FreeBSD/development/ia64 > > and /pub/FreeBSD/releases. > > > > Grab it before the other (slower :-) architectures have finished... > > from this can we deduce that the 5.0-DP2 is superseded with -RC1 > releases coming out for all the architectures soon ? From my point of view: yes. > one suggestion - can we look at adopting a naming scheme for iso > releases please, across architectures. > > e.g > > 5.0-RC1-ia64-disc1.iso > 5.0-RC1-ia64-disc2.iso > > perhaps with a symlink of miniinst.iso to disc1, etc. I'm not sure what's non-standard about miniinst and/or disc2. It's not that I have choosen these names. It's what the automation gave me. But other than that, yes. Having equivalent names for equivalent discs is not too much to ask. > thanks for the headsup - ftp.au is fetching the ia64 bits > now (and replacing our 5.0dp2 bits..) Thank you, -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021208014950.GB1987>