Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:13:30 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Jan Srzednicki <winfried@student.agh.edu.pl> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: background fsck did not create lost+found Message-ID: <200301221813.h0MIDUTF040121@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0301221112210.22474-100000@student.uci.agh.edu.pl> References: <20030120183442.GA2778@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <Pine.GSO.4.44.0301221112210.22474-100000@student.uci.agh.edu.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:14:47 +0100 (CET), Jan Srzednicki <winfried@student.agh.edu.pl> said: > Would that be a big problem to allow some fsck option not to erase all > these softupdates-pending inodes, but to put them in lost+found as usual? It certainly couldn't be done with the background fsck, because background fsck works on a snapshot and not the running filesystem; thus, it cannot make any allocations -- it can only deallocate things. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200301221813.h0MIDUTF040121>