Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:48:43 +0200 From: Victor Balada Diaz <victor@bsdes.net> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing dependencies on shared libraries Message-ID: <20060414194843.GC702@pato.euesrg02.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604141520060.3907@sea.ntplx.net> References: <20060414182846.GA702@pato.euesrg02.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604141439280.3685@sea.ntplx.net> <20060414190010.GB702@pato.euesrg02.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604141520060.3907@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 03:20:41PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > > >On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:41:06PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > >>On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > >> > >>>Hi, > >>>I found that ldd doesn't report libc as a dependency on most (all?) > >>>libraries: > >>> > >>>pato> ldd /usr/lib/libfetch.so > >>>/usr/lib/libfetch.so: > >>> libssl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (0x4816a000) > >>> libcrypto.so.3 => /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x48198000) > >>> > >>>does anyone know why? > >> > >>AFAIK, it's being worked on. It's not just libc either, -pthread > >>also has to start linking to libpthread. > > > >Thanks for your fast reply. > > > >I'm trying to create a dependency in some libraries, but it does > >have the same problem as the libc. Is there any way to workaround it? > > Well, you can always try adding -lc. I tried, but it doesn't work. ldd continues to tell me that libc is not a dependency, but if i use objdump -p it does appear as NEEDED. -- La prueba mas fehaciente de que existe vida inteligente en otros planetas, es que no han intentado contactar con nosotros.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060414194843.GC702>