Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 16:28:03 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: billf@chc-chimes.com Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/10375 - where to import? Message-ID: <199904132328.QAA49347@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.96.990413154843.153A-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com> (message from Bill Fumerola on Tue, 13 Apr 1999 15:51:51 -0400 (EDT)) References: <Pine.HPP.3.96.990413154843.153A-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> * Would it be proper to put it in benchmarks as a primary, or at least a * virtual? * * Is benchmarks only for _system_ benchmarks (I consider X an application, * if so see xengine)? I think benchmarks is fine. It's hard to justify a www proxy benchmark being in www when we already have tcpblast, netperf etc. in benchmarks (and there is a net category). -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904132328.QAA49347>