Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 13:29:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Gerard Roudier <groudier@club-internet.fr> Cc: Chris Csanady <cc@137.org>, scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sym driver 0.4.0 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909301327040.78588-100000@beppo.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.990930224101.531A-100000@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > I'll try it for higher LUNs when I get a chance to look at this- I have a > > target I can configure for up to a fairly arbitrary number of luns, > > Thanks. > > > although I'd like to know how you can support more than 32 luns for > > parallel SCSi w/o going to SCCLUN semantics. > > SPI2 allows 6 bits for the LUN number. I'll go back and (re)check that spec then. How does this apply to revisions less than SCSI-3? > > > You should note that there is a setting now in cam_xpt.c such that only > > luns 0..7 will be searched unless there's a quirk for a device. There are > > far too many broken devices out there that just do strange things when you > > go into the higher luns. > > May-be, for covering all existing multi-lun devices, at least luns 0,..,15 > should be supported. I would think not for the generic case. I originally thought so, but I ran into too much breakage. It's simple enough to say "if <= SCSI2 and !HILUNS_QUIRKED, then maxlun == 8". To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909301327040.78588-100000>