Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 09:28:42 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Mikhail Kruk <meshko@cs.brandeis.edu> Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <199910181528.JAA16467@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9910180159150.14074-100000@daedalus.cs.brandeis.edu> References: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9910180159150.14074-100000@daedalus.cs.brandeis.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> So Linux emulation gives better performance than netive port? WOuld 1.1.8 > do better than that? Yes, but not better than the Linux port. The reason the linux port does better has *nothing* to do with emulation, but because the linux port has a good JIT, and the native port does not. > off-topic: Would using Linux Netscape show the same order of performance > boost? Right now this applet take 30 (!) seconds under FreeBSD Netscape. > Compare to 1.5 seconds with Windows Netscape and 10 seconds on RedHat... Nope, because the JIT is part of the JDK, not part of netscape. Linux netscape has no JIT, although the Windows version does. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199910181528.JAA16467>