Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 19:43:42 +0600 (NS) From: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> To: Roman Shterenzon <roman@harmonic.co.il> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, "Daniel M. Eischen" <eischen@vigrid.com>, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is it late already? (-pthread) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010301942160.90486-100000@iclub.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010301431400.17779-100000@shark.harmonic.co.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, there! On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > The pthreads in RELENG_4 are quite broken (I mean, very-very broken). > Daniel M. Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> has produced some patches which are > in -current for some time now, and were tested by me in -stable. > They were found to work great for all things I've tested it on. > It works *better* than the original implementation _anyway_, which is, > like I said is broken. > So, perhaps it wasn't in -current for a long time, but leaving the current > implementation is like shipping broken pthreads apriori what problems are you talking about? maybe this will explain problems we have with ACE+TAO on RELENG_4 /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0010301942160.90486-100000>