Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 08:20:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Loren Koss <loren@pciway.com> To: Smith@ian.org Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFilter NAT.. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007210818240.4835-100000@unix.pciway.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007210922420.10000-100000@user1.erieonline.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Whoa.. from outside your network you could telnet to y.y.y.y?? For me, I wont be able to since it is a 192.168.1.x network.. from inside my network, sure I can telnet to it.. Did you mean you could telnet to x.x.x.x 79 and 13? Regarding whats not working, when i call ipnat -f ipnat.conf it says FILE EXISTS which I assume it is referring to the second line below since the first one gets in the list properly.. I read something on some archive that someone else had seen this bug. Maybe there is a patch. Dunno.. Loren Koss http://www.checkthegrid.com Before you go to the movies...Check The Grid! On Fri, 21 Jul 2000 Smith@ian.org wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Loren Koss wrote: > > Has anyone tried to redirect more than one port using IPNat? It doesn't > > seem to work.. Is there a patch? > > > > rdr rl0 a.b.c.d port 80 -> 192.168.1.10 port 80 > > rdr rl0 a.b.c.d port 2000 -> 192.168.1.10 port 2000 > > > > The second one wont work.. > > I just tried... > > rdr wb0 x.x.x.x/32 port 79 -> y.y.y.y port 79 tcp > rdr wb0 x.x.x.x/32 port 13 -> y.y.y.y port 13 tcp > > ...and could telnet to both port 79 and 13 on y.y.y.y with no > problems. What isn't working for you? > > This is on FreeBSD 4.1-RC #0: Fri Jul 21 01:47:41 EDT 2000 that > was CVSuped about noon EST on the 20th. > > -- > Ian > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007210818240.4835-100000>