Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 14:45:25 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: <ksemat@wawa.eahd.or.ug> Cc: <security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Fwd: Vendors For WU-FTPD Please Read Message-ID: <200111201945.fAKJjP038014@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111202023100.28220-100000@sanyu1.sanyutel.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111201104060.988-100000@ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111202023100.28220-100000@sanyu1.sanyutel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:25:46 +0300 (EAT), <ksemat@wawa.eahd.or.ug> said: > rdist is an interesting approach for keeping multiple machine upto date. Unfortunately (and I can speak from experience) rdist's protocol is fairly brain-dead and runs in lock-step, thus dramatically bloating the time it takes to do even a null update on a large file set. If there were another option that did what rdist does, I'd switch in an instant. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111201945.fAKJjP038014>