Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 09:53:40 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: John Utz <john@utzweb.net> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org>, <freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: is there a technical reason for apm or pnp to NOT be klds? Message-ID: <15568.3972.195679.95790@caddis.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204302326280.30730-100000@jupiter.linuxengine.net> References: <15567.27168.230527.88559@caddis.yogotech.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204302326280.30730-100000@jupiter.linuxengine.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I believe John has a patch for APM that I promised to test a long time > > ago that fixes much of this. Note, if APM didn't get loaded before > > someone used the APM utility, bad things would happen, but this is no > > worse than disabling APM. > > of the many freebsd hacking Johns in the world, of which do you speak? Obviously not you. To be honest, I don't remember. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15568.3972.195679.95790>