Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:38:11 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Andres Mejias <morpheo@arsystel.com> Subject: Re: portupgrade problem Message-ID: <41964683.70804@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0411130927310.15461-100000@pancho> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0411130927310.15461-100000@pancho>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Linimon wrote:
> Since we've never told porters that they can't cross-depend on
> categories,
Not sure I get you right here. Are you saying we should forbid for a port in
category a to depend on a port in category b? That doesn't seem to make much
sense.
> we can't really fuss at them for having done so. Again,
> I personally consider it a bug that japenese is depended on,
I'd say it depends on the application and why the dependency is needed. FWIW,
the fact that INDEX building with incomplete portstrees is not supported
stands. Now that the cvsup-supplied indices are gone, more people will become
aware of that fact (or the fetchindex target :), that's all.
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41964683.70804>