Date: 09 Apr 2004 15:48:11 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Andreas Davour <ante@update.uu.se> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem Message-ID: <44vfk9c4qs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404092124210.28354@Tempo.Update.UU.SE> References: <4076527F.1060902@users.sourceforge.net> <4076F68C.70909@daleco.biz> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404092124210.28354@Tempo.Update.UU.SE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andreas Davour <ante@update.uu.se> writes: > That sounds like an important port. I don't understand why I wasn't > getting it when I cvsup'ed then. Is there a line the the ports-supfile > which should read 'ports-accessibility'? Maybe I should add it and cvsup > again. There probably wasn't such a category when you created your supfile, but there is now. For the complete list, see /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile on a recently updated system (or check cvsweb). I find it easier to to use the "ports-all" category, and then use a refuse file for the categories I *don't* want. That way new categories are added by default, rather than left out by default.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44vfk9c4qs.fsf>