Date: Wed, 12 Mar 1997 14:07:22 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu> To: Andrew <andrew@ugh.net.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2-GAMMA & netatalk Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.970312140450.475C-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.93.970312125024.235A-100000@cottontail.hobart.tased.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Mar 1997, Andrew wrote: > > Actually it builds out of the box. Should be pretty straightforward. And > > yes, a Makefile is in there. :) > > Would it be worth doing it up as a port then - even one that did no > modification but just so people could find it easily now the options are > built in to the kernel? I've been tempted to do this to a couple of other packages that are build-from-box just so people can find them. We would have to ask ports@freebsd.org if this is OK rationale for a port. The only problem with Netatalk is that since it is a beta, there is a pretty high percentage chance of the distfile going away and breaking the port. > I am willing to do it if people think its a good idea... Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.94.970312140450.475C-100000>