Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 18:21:13 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: tom@sdf.com Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, markm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Small patch for xinetd Message-ID: <199704210121.SAA23873@blimp.mimi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.94.970418104734.7143C-100000@misery.sdf.com> (message from Tom Samplonius on Fri, 18 Apr 1997 10:53:16 -0700 (PDT))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* This is a small patch for the security/xinetd port. I've been using * xinetd on a production server for a few months now. The xinetd process * was started on Oct 28, 1996 and is still running! It is ok to send patches like this via send-pr. That way, we can redirect the patch to the maintainer easily. * This patch is rather critical for anyone using xinetd in a busy * production system with lots of sluggish dial-up PPP connections. So, Mark, what do you think? :) Satoshi ------- * *** xinetd/defs.h.orig Thu Mar 20 11:29:27 1997 * --- xinetd/defs.h Thu Mar 20 11:29:46 1997 * *************** * *** 100,106 **** * /* * * Used for listen(2) * */ * ! #define LISTEN_BACKLOG 7 * * /* * * When explicit values are given for enum's, that is because the structures * --- 100,106 ---- * /* * * Used for listen(2) * */ * ! #define LISTEN_BACKLOG 64 * * /* * * When explicit values are given for enum's, that is because the structures * * * * * Tom * * *
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704210121.SAA23873>