Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 19:35:11 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: freebsd-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: question about includes in ports Message-ID: <12898.843446111@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 22 Sep 1996 19:25:23 PDT." <Pine.NEB.3.95.960922192040.352G-100000@nike>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -I/usr/local/include to the CFLAGS= line... is this the right fix? or > should the ports be fixed? The port is fixed, it's just you who are out of date. ;-) It's already been discussed here many times that the ports collection follows -current in preparation for 2.2. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12898.843446111>