Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 21:06:51 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: StarOffice /Linux - emul speed? Message-ID: <Mutt.19970301210651.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970301190844.4627A-100000@korin.warman.org.pl>; from Andrzej Bialecki on Mar 1, 1997 19:28:50 %2B0100 References: <m0vvtDY-000Fz6C@rabbit.augusta.de> <Pine.NEB.3.95.970301190844.4627A-100000@korin.warman.org.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > However, one thing is bugging me: I run it on P133 64M RAM, and it runs > somewhat slooow. Does it have something to do with the linuxulator > performance, or is it just a feature? I'd be glad if someone could compare > the speed under both OSes. I wouldn't even be surprised if it ran faster on FreeBSD, due to its high resource consumption (and FreeBSD probably behaving better under load). I think StarOffice is known to be slow, 64 MB RAM is said to be the minimum. I've got a copy of Applixware for testing lately, and it seems to do fine. I can't complain about performance problems, and that's with a 32 MB machine. (The only thing now is that i'm totally unable to make any sense out of this kind of kindergarten-age applications. Fancy picture icons everywhere...) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970301210651.j>